[1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL]
[00:00:05]
WELCOME TO THE CHANNEL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF GEE.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG HAT, UH, PLANNING, ZONING COMMISSION FOR, UH, JANUARY 20TH.
UM, CAN I GET A ROLL CALL PLEASE? CHAIRMAN HUMAN.
VICE CHAIR, ROSE COMMISSIONER CLUB HERE.
COMMISSIONER KIMBALL, COMMISSIONER EBERLY HERE, COMMISSIONER PEACOCK AND COMMISSIONER FLANDERS HERE.
UM, THE NEXT FOR BUSINESS, THE, MY AGENDA DISAPPEARED, BUT I KIND OF FIGURED OUT WHAT THIS, UM, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COMMISSIONER.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
[3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
UM, OKAY.NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 6TH MEETING.
UM, ANY CORRECTIONS ADDITIONS CHANGES TO THE MINUTES OF THAT MEETING? IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION THROUGH THE CHAIR, TRADITIONAL ROOMS. I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE LAST MEETING.
SO I WILL BE ABSTAINING AS I WAS NOT AT THAT MEETING.
UH, ANY FURTHER COMMENTS, OTHERWISE ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY WITH ONE ABSTENTION.
[4. AGENDA ITEMS]
DURING THE REGULAR THAT, I'M SORRY.DURING THE STUDY SESSION, WE HAD TWO ITEMS ON THE STUDY SESSION, VARIOUS COMMENTS TO STAFF, UM, SUSAN D ON THE ITEM B THE APPLICANT, UM, LIKE A HEARING OR WE'D LIKE TO GO TO DRC WITH THE APPLICANT.
THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH YOU DURING THE, THIS REGULAR SESSION RIGHT NOW, BEFORE PROCEEDING TO A DRC.
SO THEY WOULD LIKE TO COME UP.
WE HAVE ACTUALLY TWO ITEMS. WE HAVE A, UM, DAVID, DO WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION ON THE CHANGE OF THE CANCELING, BOTH MEETINGS IN FEBRUARY? WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION ON THAT, OR CAN WE JUST INCLUDE IT IN THE CONSENT AS TO THE CHAIR? UM, JUST FOR THE RECORD, THE CANCELLATION ITEMS C CANCELLATION OF THE FEBRUARY 3RD FINDINGS ON COMMISSION MEETING THAT HAS BEEN REVISED TO SAY, UH, CANCELLATION OF THE FEBRUARY 3RD AND THE FEBRUARY 17TH FINDING ZONING COMMISSION MEETINGS.
SO BOTH MEETINGS IN FEBRUARY WOULD BE CANCELED.
SO WE CAN JUST MAKE THE MOTION WITH THE, THAT THE CHANGE ON THAT CORRECT CHART OF MOTION.
SO THEREFORE MY VITAMIN A AND SEE THAT WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THAT ONE ADDITIONAL STIPULATION IN THERE.
I DIDN'T THINK WE HAD ANY STIPULATIONS OTHER THAN WE DID ASK STAFF TO REVIEW THE TRAFFIC ON ITEM A, BUT THERE WASN'T A STIPULATION, SO.
SO DO I HAVE A MOTION FROM ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMMISSIONER? I REALLY WE'RE GOING TO PLAY CARDS AND SEE WHO GETS THE HIGHEST CARD.
I ALREADY GOT A TEXT FROM SOMEBODY WHO'S WATCHING THIS MEETING.
I'M NOT GOING TO SAY WHOSE WIFE IT IS, BUT AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ITEM YOU SPOKE OF SPECIFICALLY.
CAN WE JUST CLARIFY ON THE MOTION WE'RE ADDING THAT DAY? CANCEL, UH, ON THE 17TH.
THE COMMISSIONER WHO MADE THE MOTION, WILL YOU ADD THAT FEBRUARY 17TH DATE INTO THAT? I DIDN'T MAKE A MOTION TO ADD THE FEBRUARY 17TH DATE TO THE AGENDA AS WELL.
WE HAVE A SECOND ON THE, WE HAVE A SECOND ON THE MOTION.
UM, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.
UM, SUSAN, WE REALLY, I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED A FULL HEARING ON THIS.
I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU GAVE US A PRETTY GOOD BRIEFING OF WHAT THE ITEM IS AND I'M GOING TO SUMMARIZE BEST I CAN.
[00:05:01]
AND IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND TALK ABOUT IT, THAT'S FINE WITH ME.BUT BASICALLY THERE'S SOME SERIOUS CONCERNS FROM OUR COMMISSIONERS, I THINK WAS PRETTY MUCH UNANIMOUS FROM EVERYBODY HERE THAT, UM, THERE'S SOME CHALLENGES WITH THE SITE IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC FLOW CONCERNS ON TRAFFIC FLOW WITH THE TWO DRIVE-THROUGHS POTENTIAL DAYCARE, DROP-OFFS THINGS LIKE THAT.
UM, THERE'S ALSO CONCERN ABOUT FROM MYSELF AS WELL THAT, UM, A COUPLE OF THE COMMISSIONERS THAT WE DO REQUIRE A 12,000 SQUARE FEET.
I KNOW THE APPLICANT HAS TALKED ABOUT ONLY BUILDINGS, THE ONE PAD.
UM, SO IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND ASK ANY QUESTIONS, UM, OF THIS ITEM, I'D BE GLAD TO ENTERTAIN THAT AT THIS POINT.
I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A STAFF PRESENTATION.
SO REESE, IF YOU WANT TO COME UP OR WHOEVER WANTS TO COME UP AND MAKE THE PRESENTATION, THAT'S GREAT OR ASK QUESTIONS OR WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, HUMAN, YOU SO MUCH PLEASE SANDERSON WITH PURE LAKE.
AND MY ADDRESS FOR YOUR RECORD IS 1744 SOUTH AVISTA NUMBER TWO 17 IN MESA.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EACH OF YOU OR UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES.
WE FIND OURSELVES UNDER AND I APPRECIATE CHANDLER HOLDING IN PERSON MEETINGS.
JUST WANT TO PASS THAT COMPLIMENT ALONG.
I KNOW WE CAN DO IT SAFELY JUST AS YOU ARE.
UM, MR. CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, UH, WE FIND OURSELVES TONIGHT A LITTLE BIT FRUSTRATED AND WE RESPECT THE COMMENTS THAT YOU'VE MADE.
WE WANT TO UNDERSTAND THEM BETTER, BUT WITH THE CANCELLATION OF THE FEBRUARY MEETINGS THAT PUSHES US BACK INTO MARCH, UH, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THE SITE PLAN FOR SIX PLUS MONTHS, SIX PLUS MONTHS.
NOW WITH THE STAFF WE HAD INITIALLY PROPOSED HAVING DRIVE-THROUGHS AT THE CORNER, BUT WE'RE TOLD TO CLUSTER.
AND SO NOW WITH DIFFERENT DIRECTION, WE'RE COMING BACK AGAIN.
WE RECOGNIZE THAT THE CODE SAYS 12,000, BUT I REMIND YOU, THIS IS A THREE AND A HALF ACRE SITE, SMALL IT'S BEEN AG FOR DECADES.
UM, I THINK WE'RE IN AGREEMENT ON C1 TYPE USES THERE.
MR. COLE, YOU ASKED ABOUT THAT, BUT THE, UM, YOU'LL PROPOSE FOR DAYCARE MARKETING THAT AS A DAYCARE, I HAVEN'T GOT A LOT OF TAKERS ON IT.
IT MAY CHANGE TO BE ANOTHER C1 TYPE USE.
WE THINK THAT THE OTHER DRIVE THROUGH MAKES SENSE AT THAT LOCATION AND WORK CAREFULLY WITH THE STAFF TO GET THOSE ALIGNED.
SO LET ME JUST DRAW YOUR ATTENTION CAREFULLY TO THAT SITE PLAN.
YOU WILL SEE THAT THERE IS NOT A CLEAR MIXING OF TRAFFIC BETWEEN THAT BUILDING ON THE EASTERN PAD.
SEE, AS WE CALL IT AND PADS, AND THEN B YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S A PHYSICAL BARRIER IN THERE.
SO YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TRAFFIC FROM EITHER ONE OF THOSE PATHS, A OR B ZIPPING THROUGH THERE, THE PURPOSE WHERE SOMEONE MIGHT GET INJURED, I'LL JUST REMIND YOU.
THERE'S A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT IT REQUIRES A TRAFFIC PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BEFORE ANY DAYCARE COULD HAPPEN THERE.
WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE, DRIVE-THROUGHS NOTICE THAT THE INSURANCE FOR THE PAD, A, WHICH WE HOPE IS A STARBUCKS, IS THERE AT THE NORTH END.
SO ANY JAM IN THAT ENTRANCE AND, UH, YOU KNOW, THEN THAT WOULD NOT AFFECT THE ENTRANCE OF PAPPY.
UM, WE WE'VE LOOKED AT THOSE THINGS.
WE'VE TRIED TO STUDY THEM OUT AND WORKING CAREFULLY WITH STAFF.
THAT'S THE DESIGN THAT WE CAME UP WITH, THOSE NOT LOCATION OF INSURANCES ON MCQUEEN AND PACO.
IT'S DIFFICULT TO ADJUST THOSE ANYMORE BECAUSE OF BOTH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRAINTS, CONSTRAINTS IN THE FIELD, SUCH AS WHERE THAT ACCESS POINT IS ON A MCQUEEN.
AND THEN ALSO THERE'S SOME LARGE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS ON, UH, PECOS THAT JUST MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO SAY, WE CAN PUT THAT ENTRANCE WHEREVER YOU, SO TAKING THOSE TWO POINTS ON THOSE TWO MAJOR ARTERIALS AND FIXING THOSE SPOTS REALLY GIVES US THAT KIND OF INTERNAL CIRCULATION, DIFFICULT TO ADJUST IT ANY DIFFERENTLY.
UM, YOU ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS AND GAVE US A LOT OF CONCERNS, AND IT'S NOT THAT WE DON'T WANT TO GO TO DRC.
AND SO YOU HAVE THAT PROVENANCE, MR. CHAIRMAN, THERE'S A COMMISSION.
WE RESPECT THAT WE ABSOLUTELY DO.
WE WOULD LOVE THE, IF COULD NOT TO TAKE YOUR TIME TANK, BUT IF YOU'RE GOING TO GO THAT WAY, GIVE US A LITTLE BIT MORE FEEDBACK OR LET'S HAVE AN INFORMAL DRC TONIGHT JUST TO ADVANCE THE BALL.
UM, AGAIN, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS.
WE WERE SUPPOSED TO CLOSE IN EARLY MARCH, AND WE'RE NERVOUS NOW THAT WITH THESE DELAYS CAN NOT YOUR PROBLEM OURS, BUT WITH THESE DELAYS THAT CAN REALLY DESTROY THE ENTIRE DEAL.
SO WE WE'D LOVE TO ANSWER SOME MORE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, BUT WE'D LOVE TO CHANGE YOUR MIND SOMEHOW SOME WAY, BECAUSE WE REALLY THINK THIS IS
[00:10:01]
A GRID PROJECT THAT COULD USE, AND IT HAS BEEN WORKED ON IT WAS CAN, THE STAFF ARE SUPPORTIVE.UM, SO MR. CHAIRMAN, WE, WE, WE KIND OF ARE IN A SENSE BEGGING A LITTLE BIT EMBARRASSING TO SAY THAT, BUT LOOK AT ME.
I TURNED IN MY PRIDE CARD A LONG TIME AGO, AND WE REALLY WOULD JUST LOVE TO BE ABLE TO ADVANCE THIS BALL.
SO I WOULD JUST OPEN, HAVE AN OPEN CONVERSATION WITH THIS.
FIRST OF ALL, WE DON'T DO INFORMAL DRCS AT THE DIOCESE.
I APPRECIATE, I APPRECIATE THAT.
AND ANYWAY, UM, THE STANDARDS, AND I THINK THE FACT THAT I THINK YOU HEARD A LOT OF COMMENTS FROM THIS COMMISSIONER THAT YOU WERE HERE IN THE STUDY SESSIONS.
SO I THINK THAT HELPS THE DIRECTION.
THE IDEA OF GETTING TO DRC IS TO BE ABLE TO, YOU GUYS COME IN, MAYBE HAVE SOME DIFFERENT IDEAS, OR WE CAN SIT DOWN AT A FORMAL SETTING OF A DRC AND GIVE SOME MORE SPECIFIC IDEAS.
I THINK YOU HEARD ABOUT THE DRIVE-THROUGHS YOU HEARD ABOUT THE DAYCARE.
IF THAT'S WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE.
IF THIS ENDS UP BEING A POTENTIALLY, IT COULD BE THREE LITTLE RESTAURANTS.
I MEAN, BASICALLY THAT'S THE SAME KIND OF USE.
SO I THINK THAT HAVING A DRC, I FULLY UNDERSTAND, AND I, I, I CAN'T SET THE AGENDAS IN TERMS OF WHAT'S COMING THROUGH THE OLD DAYS.
WE HAD COMMISSION MEETINGS EVERY TWO WEEKS.
WE WOULD BE HERE TILL NINE O'CLOCK AT NIGHT, BUT UNFORTUNATELY DEVELOPMENT HAS CHANGED QUITE A BIT IN CHANDLER OVER THE YEARS, BUT, UM, I FULLY HEAR YOU.
UM, BUT I THINK THAT, I THINK THE COMMISSION WAS PRETTY ADAMANT ABOUT GOING TO DRC UNLESS ANYBODY WANTS TO SPEAK UP, BUT, UM, UM, WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO IT.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO AN INFORMAL DRC AT THIS POINT, SO THAT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
THANK YOU, MR. CHANG, BUT IT'S YOUR JOB THEY ASK.
SO I APPRECIATE YOU RECOGNIZING THAT ALSO, BUT, UM, YEAH, WE, WE REALLY, REALLY WOULD LIKE, WE DID HEAR THE COMMENTS.
UM, JUST A LITTLE NERVOUS THAT ONCE WE ALL SIT DOWN AND TALK AT IT, WE MIGHT END UP RIGHT WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
THAT'S ALWAYS A POSSIBILITY, BUT I THINK OUR JOB AS A COMMISSION, YOU KNOW, THE FACT THAT THIS HAS BEEN DIRT FOR DECADES, IT ACTUALLY HAS BEEN DIRT FOR A LOT LONGER THAN DECADES.
AND AS OUR LAND HAS GONE, WE, ONE THING THAT I REALLY PRIDE OURSELVES ON THIS COMMISSION, EVERY ONE OF THESE COMMISSIONERS UP HERE IS THAT OUR, AS OUR LAND IS DWINDLING IN TERMS OF WHAT WE HAVE, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S THE RIGHT THING.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONER OR DO I HAVE A MOTION, UM, TO MAKE THEM ON THE FLOOR, THROUGH THE CHAIR OR COMMISSIONER FLANDERS, WHATEVER.
I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM B TO A DR.
DRB, UH, DATE TO BE SET BY STAFF.
I DON'T KNOW IF HE CAN DO IT TONIGHT OR WE NEED TO SET A TIME TO COME BACK TO IF WE CAN SET THE FIRST MEETING OF MARCH TO COME BACK.
BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A FEBRUARY MEETING.
IS THAT MR. CHAIRMAN? THAT'S CORRECT.
THE CONTINUANCE, THE MOTION TO CONTINUE WOULD BE TO CONTINUE TO MARCH 3RD, WHICH WOULD BE THE FIRST MEETING.
DO I HAVE A SECOND, THE SECOND, HANG ON A SECOND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE AGENDA ITEM? IF NOT ALL THOSE JUST A REAL QUICK QUESTION.
THEY WOULD, WHEN WOULD THAT TRACK TO COUNCIL THROUGH THE CHAIR COMMISSIONER? UH, CLO A, THE REGULAR TRACKING WOULD GO TO APRIL 22ND.
UM, WHY APRIL 11, IF IT, IF IT'S MARCH 3RD, THERE'S TWO MEETINGS AND MARK FOR COUNCIL.
THEY ONLY HAVE ONE MEETING COUNCIL.
IT COUNCIL ONLY HAS ONE MEETING IN MARCH.
WHAT'S THE MARCH MEETING DATE, MARCH 25TH.
SO WHEN THIS BE ABLE TO TRACK ONTO THAT, WE COULD LOOK INTO THAT POSSIBILITY IF EVERYTHING IS CLEANED UP.
AND I WOULD THINK THE APPLICANTS GOING TO BE VERY ACCOMMODATING TO MAKE SURE IT GETS TO THE MARCH, THAT FIRST MEETING OF MARCH FOR COUNCIL.
ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION COME A CHEVROLET? YES.
COULD, COULD YOU, FROM MY EDIFICATION, COULD YOU EXPLAIN THE TIMING TO ME AS TO HOW TODAY'S JANUARY 20TH AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MARCH? WELL, THE UNFORTUNATE PART ABOUT IT IS, IS BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE, UM, A MEETING IN FEBRUARY.
I MEAN, THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS THEN WE'D HAVE TO HAVE ANOTHER MOTION TO NOT CANCEL THE FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING AND DO THAT.
THEN I GUESS I'LL ASK THE CITY ATTORNEY IF THAT WE COULD DO THAT.
SO IF WE WANTED TO DO THAT, WE COULD, WE COULD MAKE THE MOTION TO CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 17TH, THAT WOULD HELP THE APPLICANT.
IT STILL IS NOT GOING TO, IT'S STILL GOING TO TRACK ON THE MARCH 25TH MEETING AND THERE'S NO FIRST MEETING IN MARCH, CORRECT.
COUNSEL MOVED THAT MEETING OUT.
IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO US, YOUR UNDERSTANDING THE DOES HAVE A FOR THEIR FIRST, THE ONLY MEETING IN MARCH IS THAT LATER
[00:15:01]
IN THE MONTH, RIGHT? COUNCIL? YES, THAT'S CORRECT.COUNCIL, THE ONLY MEETING FOR COUNCIL IN MARCH IS THE, LET ME ASK YOU THIS ONE.
WHEN'S THE SECOND MEETING AND COUNCIL IN FEBRUARY, IS IT THE 24TH OR SOMETHING? EVERY DAY? SO IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THIS, IF WE HAD THIS AS A PLACEHOLDER FOR, IF, IF THE APPLICANT CAME TO US WITH THIS GREAT PLAN WE MEET WITH THE, IN THE NEXT WEEK OR TWO APPLICANT COMES WITH THIS GREAT PLAN, DOES EVERYTHING EVERYBODY WANTS? COULDN'T YOU HAVE A SLOT LEFT OPEN FOR COUNCIL TO BE ON THAT FEBRUARY MEETING, UH, MR. CHAIRMAN DUE TO THE INTERNAL, UM, STAFF REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEWING MEMOS AND GETTING THEM REVIEWED.
UM, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THAT DEADLINE.
WELL, IF YOU HAVE A PLACEHOLDER ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA FOR THAT MEETING, THERE'S A POSSIBILITY WE COULD DO THAT.
UH, POS I'M NOT SAYING WE CAN DO IT FOR SURE IF THERE'S A POSSIBILITY.
SO, UH, TECHNICALLY, UM, THE, IT WAS ADVERTISED FOR THAT MEETING.
SO IT'S EITHER GOING TO BE A CONTINUANCE MEMO OR A REGULAR MEMO, BUT IF IT'S ADVERTISED TO THAT MEETING, IF WE COME UP WITH SOMETHING ON FEBRUARY 17, THEN IT COULD STAY ON THAT AS ADVERTISED.
AND IT'S JUST MATTER OF PUTTING THE STAFF MEMO IN THERE.
AND MR. ANDERSON, I KNOW IS GOING TO COME UP WITH THIS GREAT PLAN.
THAT'S GOING TO COME BACK TO US ON THE 17TH AND EVERYBODY'S GOING TO LOVE IT AND WON'T BE ANY TWEAKS OR ANYTHING.
SO THERE'S STILL THAT QUESTION OF THE INTERNAL TIMING, WHERE WE HAVE DEADLINES TOO, SO THAT THOSE MAMMALS FOR THE CITY MANAGER AND THE DIRECTORS TO REVIEW.
SO MY RECOMMENDATION IS THOUGH, IS TO MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO TRY AND BE ABLE TO DO THAT AS PART OF CHANDLER, BEING A VERY BUSINESS FRIENDLY COMMUNITY.
WE DO PUT PEOPLE THROUGH THE RINGERS A LITTLE BIT IN TERMS OF MAKING THINGS LOOK GREAT, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IF WE CAN ACCOMMODATE IT, HAVING THAT, AND YOU KNOW, KEVIN'S HERE IN THE AUDIENCE AS WELL, BUT LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AT LEAST, UM, WE CAN'T PROMISE THE APPLICANT, BUT IF EVERYTHING'S CLEAN AND YOU HAVE A PLACEHOLDER AND YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE'S A POTENTIAL TO BE ABLE TO DO IT.
SO I'D LIKE THE MOTION MAKER TO READJUST THE MOTION TO THE FEBRUARY 17TH TIMEFRAME.
AND THEN THE SECOND WOULD HAVE TO AGREE TO THAT.
POINT OF ORDER, IF WE'VE ALREADY VOTED ON THAT, WOULDN'T IT BE A NEW MOTION PERIOD? I'M SORRY, SINCE WE'VE ALREADY VOTED ON THAT, WOULDN'T THAT BE A NEW 17TH? I SAID, I POINTED THE CITY ATTORNEY WHO WAS SHAKING AND SAID YES A MINUTE AGO.
SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO CLARIFY IT, SO THAT CHAIR, WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS A NEW MOTION TO, UH, TO CANCEL THE, LET ME THINK ABOUT THIS.
WE NEED A MOTION TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THERE WILL BE A FEBRUARY 17TH, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AND THEN A SEPARATE MOTION TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THAT MEETING.
BUT WOULD WE HAVE TO AMEND THE CONSENT AGENDA, VOTE ON ITEM C? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE THINKING FRIDAY WAS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA VOTE.
SO I THINK A SEPARATE MOTION STATING NOW THAT THERE WILL BE A FEBRUARY 17TH SUFFICE FOR ME.
I DON'T THINK ANYBODY'S GOING TO OBJECT TO IT, SO, YEAH.
SO I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO REINSTATE THE FEBRUARY 17TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WOULD DO THAT FIRST AND THEN WE'LL DO THE SECOND MOTION.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO REINSTATE REINSTATE THE FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING.
SO I NEED A SECOND ON THAT A SECOND.
WE HAVE COMMISSIONER FLANDERS SECOND ON THAT.
SO ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF REINSTATING, THE FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING SAY, AYE, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE NOT ANY OPPOSED.
NOW A SECOND MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM B TO THE DRC MEETING, UM, FOR FEBRUARY 17TH IS THAT IS NOW THAT THE DRC MEETING WOULD BE THAT THEY CONTINUE THE ITEM.
THE ITEM WOULD COME BACK ON THE AGENDA.
THE DRC MEETING WILL BE BEFORE THAT.
SO WE WOULD NEED TO FIGURE FEB.
WELL, WE'RE NOT THE DRC MEETING WILL BE SET BY STAFF, BUT ALL WE'RE SETTING RIGHT NOW.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE.
ITEM B TWO, A DRS DRC WAS THE DATE SET BY STEP, BUT TO BRING IT BACK, BUT THE ITEM WOULD COME BACK ON FEBRUARY 17TH, RIGHT? THE, UH, ITEM WOULD COME BACK ON OUR FEBRUARY 17TH.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION, SECOND COMMISSIONER, EVERLY, SECOND THAT, OKAY.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM? OKAY.
WE'RE TRYING TO BE BUSINESS FRIENDLY.
WE'RE TRYING TO HELP YOU GUYS, SO, OKAY.
ANY COMMENTS FROM STAFF? OKAY.
WITH THAT? I WILL JOIN THE MEETING.